Skip to content

How do young and older walkers adapt their gait to accommodate sudden gait perturbations?

How do young and older walkers adapt their gait to accommodate sudden gait perturbations? - Responses to gait perturbations in young and older walkers

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON49426
Enrollment
80
Registered
2020-03-11
Start date
2020-03-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

In de studies die hier voorliggen worden de effecten van normale veroudering onderzocht. ageing old age

Interventions

In studies 1 and 2 a computer-controlled split-belt treadmill (M-Gait
Motek, Amsterdam, NL) will be used. The belt movement can be reversed with a high acceleration to induce slip-like perturbations. Belt-speed will be set to -1.2 m/s in both studies. In study 1, 2
200 strides). During the *perturbation phase* (phase III), a series of 30 slip-like perturbations will be presented to the right leg (10-12 minutes). During the *washout phase* (phase IV
210 strides), no more perturbations will be presented, but the participants will not be informed about this. In study 2, 20 healthy young (18-30) participants and 20 healthy older (65-80) participa

Sponsors

Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Participant is healthy 2. Is able to walk for 30 minutes without problems 3. Meets the age requirements at the time of inclusion (18-30 or 65-80)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Neurological, orthopedic, visual, sensorimotor, vestibular or other impairments and injuries that are known to affect walking and/or balance 2. Participants should not have any prior experience with similar experimental paradigms 3. Recent hip or knee arthroplasty ( 30 5. For study 2 only: participation in study 1

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Normalized step length: Defined as the distance between centers of pressure (CoP) of the feet at initial foot contact, normalized for leg length. 2. Normalized step time: defined as the time between two subsequent initial foot contacts, normalized for leg length. 3. Step width: defined as the absolute difference between the local minimum/ maximum CoP position during the consecutive contralateral single support phases of each stride. 4. Step length ratio, defined as (step length left - step length right)/ (step length left + step length right). 5. Step time ratio, defined as (step time left - step time right)/ (step time left + step time right). 6. Margin of Stability, defined as the distance between the extrapolated centre of mass (XCoM) and the CoP at contralateral foot lift. The XCoM is defined as CoM (i.e. the Centre of Mass) + VCoM*W0, where VCoM is the instantaneous velocity of the CoM and W0 is the gravitational acceleration.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Falls efficacy scale international 2. Perceived physical activity 3. Dutch General Self-efficacy Scale

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026