Case management after acquired brain injury

Case management after acquired brain injury - Case management brain injury

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON49157

Enrollment

209

Registered

2019-09-18

Start date

2019-11-25

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

niet aangeboren hersenletsel ABI acquired brain injury

Interventions

The aim of case management after brain injury is to support patients* and caregivers* self-management of the consequences of brain injury, to improve/maintain psychosocial well-being, to prevent (es

the form and intensity of case management depend on their individual needs, varying from providing information via telephone or email to multiple contact moments, support in finding/accessing care s

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria for patients: * Acquired brain injury objectified by medical specialist (see appendix for diagnosis and medical codes) * Aged 18 years or older * Living in the community prior to the injury * Discharged home after hospital/rehabilitation * Sufficient command of the Dutch language * Access to a computer and the internet (monitoring tool and questionnaires) * Willing and able to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: A potential subject will be excluded from participation in this study when they have degenerative disorders (e.g. Parkinson*s disease, dementia) because of the progressive course of the disease. Patients with a diagnosis related to neuro-oncology will be excluded as well, since an intensive care trajectory is already in place for these patients.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
The effectiveness will be evaluated by assessment of self-management (Patient Activation Measure (PAM)), psychosocial well-being (Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation (USER-P) restriction subscale, the Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LiSat) and care needs (Longer-term Unmet Needs after Stroke (LUNS)) and service use (care consumption list). Caregiver outcomes include self-efficacy (Carer Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES)), caregiver burden (Caregiver Strain Index (CSI)), psychosocial well-being (LiSat, HADS), caregiver needs (Family Needs Questionnaire (FNQ)). The feasibility will be evaluated using registration by caseamangers and patients/caregivers. The costeneffectiveness is measured with a specific costquestionnaire and the EQ-5D-5L.	—

Measure

Time frame

The effectiveness will be evaluated by assessment of self-management (Patient Activation Measure (PAM)), psychosocial well-being (Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation (USER-P) restriction subscale, the Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LiSat) and care needs (Longer-term Unmet Needs after Stroke (LUNS)) and service use (care consumption list). Caregiver outcomes include self-efficacy (Carer Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES)), caregiver burden (Caregiver Strain Index (CSI)), psychosocial well-being (LiSat, HADS), caregiver needs (Family Needs Questionnaire (FNQ)). The feasibility will be evaluated using registration by caseamangers and patients/caregivers. The costeneffectiveness is measured with a specific costquestionnaire and the EQ-5D-5L.

—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)