Skip to content

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS): effect on pharmacokinetics

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS): effect on pharmacokinetics - Effect of TIPS on pharmacokinetics

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON48883
Enrollment
11
Registered
2018-07-04
Start date
2019-06-25
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cirrhosis scarring of the liver

Interventions

This study consists of three interventions per patient. Patients will receive a single oral administration of a drug cocktail two weeks before TIPS placement, a day after TIPS placement, and twelve

Sponsors

Academisch Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Liver cirrhosis as documented by liver biopsy or elastography (e.g. Fibroscan > 15 kPa) in combination with usual radiological and biochemical signs. 2. Age > 18 years. 3. Elective indication for TIPS (recurrent tense ascites, recurrent/refractory hepatic hydrothorax, or (recurrent) oesophageal or gastric bleeding treated with endoscopic band ligation (EBL) or endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) more than 2 weeks prior to screening. 4. Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Absolute contraindications for TIPS placement Child-Pugh score >= 10 MELD score > 20 Serum bilirubin 51 > µmol/L INR > 1.7 Serum creatinine > 185 µmol/L Active drug abuse or alcoholism Overt neurologic disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary study endpoint is the difference in area under the plasma concentration versus time curve for each drug following the oral administration of the drug cocktail two weeks before TIPS placement, a day after TIPS placement, and twelve weeks after TIPS placement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary endpoints include the difference in the following pharmacokinetics parameters: clearance, volume of distribution, absorption rate, mean residence time and elimination half-life. In addition, we want to assess the effect of TIPS placement on the postprandial levels of bile acids, glucose, insulin, c-peptide, GLP-1, FGF19, C4 and glucagon by MMT.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)