Skip to content

MANTA* versus suture-based closure after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Trial

MANTA* versus suture-based closure after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Trial - MASH TAVI

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON48880
Enrollment
150
Registered
2018-10-24
Start date
2018-10-29
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

injury of an artery vascular complications

Interventions

One group will undergo arteriotomy closure with the suture-based vascular closure device, the other group will undergo arteriotomy closure with a collagen-based MANTA device

Sponsors

Erasmus MC, Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Patients undergoing elective transfemoral TAVI for severe aortic valve stenosis with any commercially-available transcatheter heart valve (THV) - Common femoral artery diameter > 5.0mm (14 - 22F compatible)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Symptomatic leg ischaemia - Previous thromboendarterectomy or plastic patch of the common femoral artery - Previous implantation of a suture-based VCD less than 30 days before, or a plug-based VCD within 6 months - Unilateral or bilateral lower extremity amputation - Systemic infection or a local infection at or near the access site - Allergy to the components any of both devices (i.e. bovine materials or any other device material, including collagen and/or collagen products, polyglycolic or polylactic acid, stainless steel or nickel) - Active bleeding or bleeding diathesis including thrombocytopenia (platelet count 1.8 at the time of the procedure - Patient unable to be adequately anti-coagulated for the procedure - Morbidly obese or cachectic (BMI >40 kg/m2 or

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The composite of major vascular complications, and minor vascular complications according to VARC 2 at 30 days.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
- The individual components of the primary endpoint at 30 days and 1 year: major- and minor vascular complications defined bij VARC 2. - All-cause death including cardiac death, non-cardiac vascular death, non-cardiovascular death. - Major or life threatening bleedings according to VARC 2 - Need for transfusions for access site related bleeding/complications - Vascular closure device failure, defined as: placement of VCD not possible or failure of a closure device to achieve haemostasis at the arteriotomy site leading to alternative treatment (other than manual compression or adjunctive endovascular ballooning) - Intra-procedural complications at the femoral access site pre-sheath removal including bleeding or swelling around the large bore sheath that may indicate hematoma formation or pseudoaneurysm formation; or peri-procedural angiographic evidence of thrombus formation or significant injury in the aorta or iliac vessels associated with procedural large bore sheath placement and/or sub-optimal anticoagulation. - Time to haemostasis: elapsed time (minutes) between sheath removal and observed haemostasis - Procedure time - Time to ambulation (TTA) - Ambulation success - Technical success - Treatment success - Clinically relevant bleeding defined as BARC 2, 3 and 5 - Length of hospital stay - Pain and discomfort score

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)