Comparative research by means of skin prick test and provocation test between hypo allergenic Migo pear and Conference pear in patients with allergy to pear.

Comparative research by means of skin prick test and provocation test between hypo allergenic Migo pear and Conference pear in patients with allergy to pear. - Migo pear

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON48489

Enrollment

Registered

2019-10-01

Start date

2019-07-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

allergy Food hypersensitivity

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Signed informed consent form 18 years of age or older, mentally competent Patients proven allergic to pear by skin prick test and prick to prick test (HEP > 0,4) Diet free of pear, earlier complaints after eating pear. No use of antihistamines in the last 72 hours before the skin test and the food challenge with pear.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patiënt under 18 years, mentally incompetent. Negative skin prick test and prick to prick test with pear (HEP

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Consuming the hypoallergenic Migo pear without experiencing an allergic reaction.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
2. How does the amount of pear, at which the patient experience symptoms, differ between the Migo pear and the Conference pear? 3. What is the difference in surface area in the skin test between the Migo pear and the Conference pear? 4. What is the difference in surface area in the skin test between the Migo pear and Birch pollen?	—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results