Skip to content

Dietary Assessment Study - An evaluation study to assess validity and acceptability of a new smartphone-based dietary assessment method

Dietary Assessment Study - An evaluation study to assess validity and acceptability of a new smartphone-based dietary assessment method - DIASS

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON48204
Enrollment
220
Registered
2019-05-13
Start date
2019-07-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

voedselconsumptieonderzoek, wanneer de app valide is zou deze in toekomst gebruikt kunnen worden voor onderzoek naar voedingsinname en allerlei ziektes en stoornissen. n.v.t.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Wageningen Universiteit
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Male/female - Aged 18-70 years old - Metabolically stable (i.e. gained or lost *3 kg in the past 3 months and willing to maintain current dietary habits for the duration of the study) - In possession of a smartphone - in possession of an e-mail address

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Not able to speak and read Dutch - Visually impaired - Currently participating in another research study(excl. EetMeetWeet) - Currently following or having completed any formal training in the field of nutrition (e.g. Nutrition and Health, Nutrition and Dietetics) - Not willing to sign the informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The main study parameters are dietary intake of 220 participants, gathered with 2hRs, 24hRs and FFQ (i.e. food groups, foods, energy, macronutrients, micronutrients). . Chemical biomarkers from urine and blood of 100 participants. Demographics and total energy expenditure from all participants.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The secondary study parameters will be the compliance to the 2hRs and the acceptability (incl. perceived burden) of the different sampling schemes.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)