Skip to content

Aspects of bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Aspects of bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis - Brace treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON47894
Enrollment
20
Registered
2016-12-21
Start date
2018-03-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

curved spine scoliosis

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Medisch Universitair Ziekenhuis Maastricht
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
12 Years to 17 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. AIS 2. Indication for conservative treatment 3. Minimum age of 12 years old 4. Eligible for follow up 5. Ability to read and write in the Dutch language 6. Patient who are physically and mentally willing and able to comply with the functional evaluation 7. Informed consent signed by both one of the parents and the patient 8. Male and female patients

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Prior surgery to the spine 2. Morbid obesity (BMI>35) 3. Any musculoskeletal or neurological (congenital) disorder 4. Patients who are unwilling to cooperate with the study protocol and follow- up schedule.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary Objective: The primary objective of the study is determining the contributing factors in bracing for AIS. The contributing factors are determined as factors of influence in the corrective possibilities and therefore end term results of the M-brace, which are currently unknown. The contributing factors are listed as secondary - fifth objective together with patient characteristics such as length and weight. The effect of contributing factors is quantified in changes of Cobb*s angle over time. The changes of Cobb*s angle over time are measured every six months on anteroposterior and lateral full spine radiographs until full bone maturation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary objective: • Compliance of brace wear o An incorporated thermal sensor (Orthotimer, Appendix 2) is used to quantify ours of brace wear per day. Sensor data is monitored every outpatient clinic visit through a wireless read-out system. Third objective • Pulmonary function and relation of brace wearing o Pulmonary function over time is measured once a year with use of dynamic and static spirometry. The measurements are with and without (very short term) brace wearing. The increased wearability and comfort of the Maastricht brace is expected to optimise pulmonary function and therefore support any form of activity whilst brace wearing. Fourth objective • Pressure distribution and development in brace wearing o Incorporated pressure sensors (Pressure Guardian) are used to quantify force and force distribution in the M-brace. Sensor data is monitored every outpatient clinic visit. It is still unclear how the force changes over time, whether there is a wear effect or if the brace applies the same force in different situations (sitting, standing ea.). Fifth objective • Motion analysis in brace (CAREN) o Motion analysis with and without brace, before, during and after treatment with M-brace. Analysis of gait and development of posture and balance before, during and after brace wear. An over- and or under correction can result in an imbalance in the coronal and or sagittal plane, and therefore a change in motion analysis. As we expect the brace to be optimally fitted, the hypotheses is that the kinematics of the walking pattern, the spaciotemporal parameters (such as walking speed, step length, ao) and measures of stability will be better comparable to short term non-brace wearing.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)