Skip to content

A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study comparing the efficacy and safety of ofatumumab versus teriflunomide in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis

A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study comparing the efficacy and safety of ofatumumab versus teriflunomide in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis - COMB157G2301

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON47697
Enrollment
20
Registered
2019-05-20
Start date
2017-02-14
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

MS Multiple Sclerosis

Interventions

Ofatumumab (OMB157G) 20 mg sc injections once every 4 (q4) weeks (following initial loading regimen of three 20 mg sc doses/week in first 14 days) + teriflunomide-matching placebo capsules orally on
Ofatumumab
Relapses
Teriflunomide

Sponsors

Novartis
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 64 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: * Male or female patients aged 18 to 55 years (inclusive) at Screening * Relapsing MS: relapsing-remitting course (RRMS), or secondary progressive (SPMS) course with disease activity * Disability status at Screening with an EDSS score of 0 to 5.5 (inclusive) * Documentation of at least: 1 relapse during the previous 1 year OR 2 relapses during the previous 2 years prior to Screening OR a positive Gd-enhancing MRI scan during the year prior to randomization * Neurologically stable within 1 month prior to randomization

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: * Patients with primary progressive MS or SPMS without disease activity * Patients meeting criteria for neuromyelitis optica * Disease duration of more than 10 years in patients with an EDSS score of 2 or less * Women of child-bearing potential unless using highly effective methods of contraception during study drug dosing and for 12 months post-dosing * Sexually active males unless they agree to use condom during intercourse while on study drug * Patients at risk of developing or having reactivation of hepatitis: positive results at Screening for serology markers for hepatitis A, B, C and E (HA, HB, HC, and HE) indicating acute or chronic infection * Patients at risk of developing or having reactivation of syphilis or tuberculosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
* Annual Relapse Rate (ARR) * Time to disability worsening as measured by 3-month confirmed worsening (3mCDW) on Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) * Time to disability worsening as measured by 6-month confirmed worsening (6mCDW) on EDSS * Time to disability improvement as measured by 6-month confirmed improvement (6mCDI) on EDSS * Number of T1 gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesions per Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) scan * Number of new or enlarging T2 lesions on MRI per year (annualized T2 lesion rate) * Neurofilament light chain (NfL) concentration in serum * Rate of brain volume loss (BVL) based on assessments of percentage brain volume change from baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
* Time to first relapse * Annualized relapse rates > 8 weeks after the onset of treatment * Risk of a 3mCDW > 8 weeks after the onset of treatment * Risk of a 6mCDW > 8 weeks after the onset of treatment * Time to a 6-month confirmed cognitive decline (6mCCD), defined as a 4-point worsening on Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) * Time to 6mCDW or 6mCCD, whichever is reached first * Change in cognitive performance relative to baseline as measured by the SDMT * Time to 6-month confirmed worsening of at least 20% in the timed 25 foot walk test (T25FW) * Time to 6-month confirmed worsening of at least 20% in the 9-hole peg test (9HPT) * Time to 6mCDI sustained until end of study as measured by EDSS * Number of new or enlarging T2 lesions between Month 12 and End of Study (EOS) * Change in T2 lesion volume relative to baseline * Proportion of patients with no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) at year 1 and 2 * Physical and psychological impact of MS disease as measured by the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) In the subgroup of newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve patients, evaluate if: * High NfL (above median) concentration at baseline is predictive of higher disease activity post baseline * Patients with a high NfL (above median) concentration at baseline benefit from a stronger relative treatment effect of ofatumumab vs teriflunomide * The safety profile of ofatumumab vs terifluomide is comparable in patients with high NfL (above median) concentration at baseline * To evaluate the safety and tolerability of ofatumumab compared to teriflunomide * To evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) of ofatumumab

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Croatia, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Korea (the Democratic Peoples Republic of), Korea (the Republic of), Kuwait, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States of America

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)