Controlled hypotensive versus massive fluid resuscitation strategy: influence on blood loss and hemostatic parameters in obstetric hemorrhage

Controlled hypotensive versus massive fluid resuscitation strategy: influence on blood loss and hemostatic parameters in obstetric hemorrhage - Resuscitation strategy in obstetric hemorrhage

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON47450

Enrollment

250

Registered

2014-01-23

Start date

2014-04-06

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

stollingsproblemen bleeding Post partum hemorrhage

Interventions

Restrictive fluid resuscitation

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Pregnant women attending the outpatient clinic - Pregnant and delivery/labor, > 24 weeks - Age >= 18 years - Informed consent - Mentally competent, understanding Dutch language

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Labor

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
In women with early, mild PPH (blood loss 500-750ml) we would like to establish whether restrictive resuscitation strategy reduces the progression to severe PPH (blood loss > 1000 ml) compared to care as usual	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. To evaluate if controlled hypotensive resuscitation reduces transfusion requirements. 2. To evaluate if controlled hypotensive resuscitation leads to less coagulopathies	—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)