Skip to content

Multicenter, randomised controlled trial comparing endoscopic Mucosal resection (EMR) And endoscopic submucosal dissecTIon (ESD) for resection of Large Distal non-pedunculated colorectal Adenomas

Multicenter, randomised controlled trial comparing endoscopic Mucosal resection (EMR) And endoscopic submucosal dissecTIon (ESD) for resection of Large Distal non-pedunculated colorectal Adenomas - MATILDA-study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON47389
Enrollment
254
Registered
2015-12-22
Start date
2016-04-26
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

adenoma polyp

Interventions

In the EMR-arm, endoscopic resection will be performed using the EMR technique (with APC or tipping in adjunct to pEMR), whereas patients randomized to the ESD-arm will undergo resection using the E

Sponsors

Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - non-pedunculated polyp larger than 20 mm in the rectum, sigmoid or descending colon found during colonoscopy - indication for endoscopic treatment - >=18 years old - written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: suspicion of malignancy, as determined by endoscopic findings (invasive Kudo pit pattern, Hiroshima type C) or proven malignancy at histology - prior endoscopic resection attempt - presence of synchronous distal advanced carcinoma that requires surgical resection - the risk exceeds the benefit of endoscopic treatment, such as patient*s with an extremely poor general condition or a very short life expectancy - the inability to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
- to compare the recurrence rate at follow-up colonoscopy after 6 months, observed from resected residual disease or, if not present, from biopsies of the scar

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
- to compare the radical (R0-)resection rate, defined as dysplasia free vertical and lateral resection margins at histology - To compare the cost effectiveness at 36 months - To compare the perceived burden and quality of life among patients - To compare the surgical referral rate defined as the number of patients that are referred for surgical management at 36 months - To compare the complication rate - To compare the long-term recurrence rate at follow-up colonoscopy after 36 months, observed from resected residual disease or, if not present, from biopsies of the scar

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)