depression mood disorder
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: - Male or female and aged between 18 and 65 inclusive. - Diagnosed with a depressive episode by a physician (either first episode or recurrent) and requiring treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) medication (excluding fluoxetine). - Prescribed an SSRI by a physician for the treatment of depression within the 7 days prior to Visit 1, but has not yet started taking the medication. - Is intending to start SSRI treatment within 7 days of Visit 1.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: - Previous history of mania. - Is currently taking an antidepressant medication or has stopped antidepressant treatment within 2 weeks prior to Visit 1. Participants who are taking or have taken antidepressant medication for treatment of a different condition at a dose which does not have an antidepressant effect are eligible for inclusion. - Requires immediate referral to alternative mental health services (e.g. where patient seen in primary care is referred to secondary care services). - Presents to a physician with significant current suicidal intent requiring enhanced care.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Primary Endpoint * Change in QIDS-SR-16 score from week 0 (baseline) to week 8. [Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomology - Self Report] | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Secondary Objectives: * To compare the change from in QIDS-SR-16 score at baseline in to QIDS-SR-16 score QIDS-SR-16 score (i.e. treated as a continuous variable) at week 8 between depressed patients receiving treatment directed by the PReDicT Test and those receiving TaU. * To determine whether use of the PReDicT Test to direct antidepressant treatment results in an increased proportion of depressed patients showing a response to treatment at week 8 compared to TaU, where response is defined as a decrease of 50% or more from baseline MADRS score. o MADRS: Montgomery*Åsberg Depression Rating Scale. * To determine whether use of the PReDicT Test to direct antidepressant treatment results in an increased proportion of depressed patients achieving remission at week 8 compared to TaU where remission is defined as QIDS-SR-16 score of 5 or less. * To determine whether use of the PReDicT Test to direct antidepressant treatment results in an increased proportion of depressed patients achieving remission at week 8 compared to TaU where remission is defined as MADRS score of 7 or less. * To compare the change from the QIDS-SR-16 score at baseline to the QIDS-SR-16 scorein QIDS-SR-16 score (i.e. treated as a continuous variable) at week 12 between depressed patients receiving treatment directed by the PReDicT Test and those receiving TaU. * To compare the change from QIDS-SR-16 score at baselinebaseline in to QIDS-SR-16 score (i.e. treated as a continuous variable) at 24 and 48 weeks between depressed patients receiving treatment directed by the PReDicT Test and those receiving TaU. Health Economic Objectives * To determine the impact on societal costs and cost-effectiveness/cost-utility of the PReDicT Test intervention in comparison to TaU over 24 weeks. * To determine the impact on societal costs and cost-effectiveness/cost-utility of the PReDicT Test intervention in comparison to TaU over 48 weeks. Acceptability and Implementation Obje | — |
Countries
The Netherlands