Skip to content

ORthosis vs No Orthosis after surgically Treated traumatic thoracolumbar fractures

ORthosis vs No Orthosis after surgically Treated traumatic thoracolumbar fractures - ORNOT-study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON47142
Enrollment
45
Registered
2018-09-13
Start date
2016-11-29
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

spine fracture Thoracolumbar fracture

Interventions

Orthosis versus no orthosis.
Fracture
Surgery
Thoracolumbar

Sponsors

Vrije Universiteit Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 64 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Age 18 * 65 years - Traumatic thoracolumbar spine fracture from thoracic 7 * lumbar 4 - AO fracture types A-C - Undergoing surgical dorsal fixation for fracture

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Inadequate knowledge of Dutch language or to fill in questionnaire - Complete or partial spinal cord injury (ASIA A to D) - (Additional) anterior surgical stabilization - Thoracolumbar fracture of other aetiology than traumatic, e.g. pathologic, infectious - Not able to walk before fracturing vertebra - Unable to come to the outpatient clinic (e.g. residing outside the Netherlands) - Injury Severity Score (ISS) * 16 - Brain injury with Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) * 4 - Solitary Lumbar 5 fracture - Diagnosed osteoporosis; using bisphosphonates or diagnosed by DEXA-scan - Psychiatric history - Inability to wear an orthosis, most probable reasons: o BMI > 35 o Thoraco-abdominal wounds (through trauma or secondary from surgery) on places at which the orthosis contacts the body so aggravation of pain or chances of infection increase significantly. o Pre-existing spine deformities (scoliosis or very severe kyphosis/lordosis) which impair the use of the orthosis or aggravate pain.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main study parameter is the difference in pain after six weeks noted on the NRS-score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Pain a. as reported on the NRS scale on each day the brace is worn directly post-operative (average of 24 hours) and on 2, 6, 12 weeks and 6, 12 months (average of last week). b. Pain medication use at the same measuring moments. Rated on three steps; paracetamol, NSAID*s and opiods, noted as yes/no. 2. Quality of life a. EQ-5D-5L on day of discharge and at 12 weeks and 6, 12 months 3. Back pain related function a. ODI at 2, 6, 12 weeks and 6, 12 months. 4. Kyphosis (Cobb-angle) a. Measured on sagittal CT pre-operative and conventional standing lateral X-ray at discharge and 6, 12 weeks and 6, 12 months. 5. Increased risk of infections: a. Wound infection (culture proven or antibiotics given) b. Decubitus (clinically diagnosed and noted) c. Pulmonary infections (culture proven or antibiotics given) d. Urinary tract infections (urinary sample, culture proven or antibiotics given) 6. Ileus (clinically diagnosed, gastic drainage tube given and noted in chart) 7. Clinically relevant deep venous thrombosis (ultrasound proven and treated) 8. Hospital stay (days) 9. Return to work (weeks/days) 10. Consolidation on long term as seen on X-rays 11. Subjective feeling of: a. Feeling the need of an orthosis if in the same situation again? b. Satisfaction with orthosis c. Subjective feeling of additional value of the orthosis 12. Orthosis compliance

Countries

The Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)