Skip to content

Surefire Infusion system vs. standard Microcatheter use during holmium-166 radioembolization for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases.

Surefire Infusion system vs. standard Microcatheter use during holmium-166 radioembolization for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases. - SIM trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON47111
Enrollment
25
Registered
2014-07-17
Start date
2014-11-26
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal cancer liver metastases

Interventions

Scout and therapeutic doses of 166Ho-microspheres will be administered in the hepatic artery during two sequential procedures on the same day. In all subjects, the use of the ARC and the standard en

Sponsors

Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: * Written informed consent. * Histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum. * Hepatic metastases with measurable morphological appearance (* 1 cm) on cross sectional imaging, located in the right and left hepatic arterial perfusion territory. * Unresectable, liver dominant disease. * Progressive disease after second line chemotherapy or no further chemotherapeutical treatment options due to severe side effects or unwillingness of the patient to undergo systemic chemotherapy. * Age * 18 years. * Expected adequacy of follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: * WHO (World health organization) performance score > 2 * Inadequate bone marrow function (hemoglobin 35 µmol/l, aspartate aminotransferase / alanine aminotransferase (AST/ALT) > 5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)) or inadequate renal function (creatinine > 1.5 x ULN). * Prior hemihepatectomy. * Compromised biliary system (biliary stent or hepaticojejunostomy). * Child Pugh score B7 or worse. * Active hepatitis B or C. * Main portal vein thrombosis on CT (or previous portal vein embolization). * Severe celiac axis stenosis on CT. * Unsuitable hepatic arterial anatomy on CT. * Treatment with systemic chemotherapy within 4 weeks prior to radioembolization. * Previous participation in a study classified as class III by a radiation safety committee * Bleeding diathesis. * Pregnancy or breast feeding. * Life expectancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary endpoint is the T/N activity concentration ratio. The primary endpoint will be compared between the ARC and standard micocatheter infusions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary endpoints include mean absorbed doses of radioactivity in tumorous and healthy liver tissue, infusion efficiency, the predictive value of 166Ho-scout dose and tumor response. These enpoints will be compared between the ARC and standard micocatheter infusions. A dose-response relationship, clinical toxicity and overall survival will be assessed for the entire cohort.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)