Skip to content

Randomized controlled study comparing the Taperloc complete versus the Taperloc complete Microplasty.

Randomized controlled study comparing the Taperloc complete versus the Taperloc complete Microplasty. - Taperloc Microplasty

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON46938
Enrollment
50
Registered
2016-12-23
Start date
2017-06-26
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

hip artrosis hip wear

Interventions

Two different hip prostheses with CE mark with known mid to long term follow up clinical will be used. All patients will receive a total hip prosthesis because of their invalidity and health problem

Sponsors

Zimmer Biomet Nederland BV
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: These are standard indications for usage of the Taperloc Complete and Taperloc Microplasty stem. ;Subjects with one of the following indications: Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis and rheumatoid arthritis. Correction of functional deformity. ;Additional inclusion criteria include: Male or female > 18 and * 70 years of age Subjects willing to return for follow-up evaluations. Subjects able to read and understand Dutch language.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Active Infection (or within 6 weeks after infection) Sepsis Osteomyelitis;Uncooperative patient or patient with neurologic disorders who are incapable of following directions diagnosed Osteoporosis or Osteomalacia Metabolic disorders which may impair bone formation Distant foci of infections which may spread to the implant site Rapid joint destruction, marked bone loss or bone resorption apparent on roentgenogram Vascular insufficiency, muscular atrophy or neuromuscular disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary study endpoint is migration at two year measured with RSA

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary study parameters/endpoints are malalignment, incorrect sizing, subsidence and intraoperative fractures, early survival of the hip prosthesis at 2 year and Clinical performance based on the clinician based outcome (HHS and radiological evaluation) and the patient based outcomes (HOOS, EQ5D, Oxford Hip score, Forgotten Hip). One site will perform migration analysis with RSA. Migration at two year will be the primary endpoint for this sub-group.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)