Skip to content

Feasibility and usability of a hand support and arm support controlled by EMG, voice or wink

Feasibility and usability of a hand support and arm support controlled by EMG, voice or wink - EMG, spraak en knipoogaansturing voor een hand- en armondersteuning na CVA.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON46413
Enrollment
20
Registered
2018-05-03
Start date
2018-05-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

CVA stroke

Interventions

Participants will be asked to perform different reach and/or grasp tasks with and without support of a hand/arm support. The reaching and grasping tasks with support will be controlled based on EMG,

Sponsors

Revalidatiecentrum Het Roessingh
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Arm support tests Patients is clinically diagnosed with a left sided unilateral ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke Patient*s age is between 18-80 years Time passed since onset of disease is at least three months The patient*s right arm is affected Score on Medical Research Council Scale of the shoulder and elbow * 3 Patient has sufficient cognitive status to understand two-step instructions in Dutch Patients has (corrected to) normal vision Patients has provided written informed consent ;Grasp support testen Patients is clinically diagnosed with unilateral ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke Patient*s age is between 18-80 years Time passed since onset of disease is at least three months The patient*s left or right hand/arm is affected Active extension of the fingers to grasp a cylindrical object Patients has sufficient cognitive status to understand two-step instructions in Dutch Patients has (corrected to) normal vision Patients has provided written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: * People with severe sensory problems of the affected upper extremity * Patients with remarkably increased muscle tone, measured by score on the Ashworth scale > 2 * People with severe acute pain of the affected hand and/ or arm * People who participate in other studies that can affect functional performance of the hand * People having insufficient knowledge of the Dutch language to understand the purpose or methods of the study * People with severe contractures limiting passive range of motion * People with co-morbidities limiting functional use of the hand * People with wounds on their hand that can give a problem when using the system

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Outcomes of the questionnaires regarding usability (System Usability scale and other questionnaire)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
* The number of attempts needed to perform the task * The number of times the system recognized the command correctly, the false positive and negative positive rate * The distance from the target location in centimeters to test the accuracy of the system * Time needed to complete the task * Success rate defined as percentage of tasks completed successfully by the user * The distance between the target location and achieved hand location after a movement (in centimeters) to assess the performance of the patient if less than 100% support is provided. * How often a good distinction can be made between reaching and reach-to-grasp movement, and the false- and negative positive rates

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)