Is Medical Moisture Retention Creme more effective than cetomacrogol creme FNA for treatment of veneus eczema? A single blinded, randomised controled study in the wound treatment centers in the Netherlands

Is Medical Moisture Retention Creme more effective than cetomacrogol creme FNA for treatment of veneus eczema? A single blinded, randomised controled study in the wound treatment centers in the Netherlands - MMRC-CETO trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON46387

Enrollment

180

Registered

2018-05-02

Start date

2018-04-02

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypostatic eczema

Interventions

Cetomacrogol creme versus MMRC

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient older than 18 years Patient with venous eczema and venous leg ulcus Severety eczema mild-POEM score 8-16 2 treatments a day possible signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: allergic for MMRC or cetomacrogol other type of eczema treated in the last 4 weeks with one of the study cream or a corticosteroid cream EAI

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Primary outcome measure: percentage of patients with eczema healed in a 6-week period.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Secondary Objective (s): 1. Percentage of patients with a reduction in the severity of the eczema. 2. Time to cure 3. Percentage of patients who have reduced the severity of itching symptoms, measured with the VAS scale. 4. The number of patients who decided to prescribe local corticosteroids in the course of the study (= end of study participation).	—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)