Skip to content

Protocol CE-marking steerable punch - A case series study on safety, efficiency, and quality of the steerable punch for future CE-marking

Protocol CE-marking steerable punch - A case series study on safety, efficiency, and quality of the steerable punch for future CE-marking - Steerable punch

Status
Unknown
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON46381
Enrollment
30
Registered
2018-11-22
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Meniscal rupture Meniscal tear

Interventions

Routine meniscectomy procedure with the steerable punch instead of ordinary punches.

Sponsors

Academisch Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - 16 years or older; - diagnosed with a traumatic meniscal tear; - scheduled for an operation to cut the traumatic meniscal tear.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Systemic disease; - Previous meniscal/knee operations; - Degenerative meniscal tear or osteochondritis dissecans - No laxity of the knee (anterior/posterior drawer test of no more than 6 mm and negative Lachman test) - Pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The main study parameter is safety, expressed by the instrument intactness during ten cycles of cleaning, sterilisation and use during a meniscectomy procedure. That is no failure will occur in terms of breakage or bending of parts or rejection in the cleaning process [dichotomous score: yes/no]. We will use three prototypes, one per surgeon. The endpoint for each surgeon is failure of the steerable punch before ten cycles or upon completion of ten cycles.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Assessment of quality measured by scoring the quality of the remaining rim by two independent experts using a still of an arthroscopic image after completion of the meniscectomy showing the full part of the rim that has been treated. Scoring is performed based on the IKDC form meniscus section[17]. Additionally results will be scored Scores the result based on a classification of the IKDCI-IV a. I. Fully smooth and stable meniscal rim b. II. Somewhat rough edges but acceptable c. III. Rough edges, requires refinement d. IV. Failed surgery, needs to be done over 2. Assessment of usability: A. Documentation of the number of errors made by the surgeon (surgical actions) and the scrub nurse ((dis)assembly) when handling the steerable punch based on video recordings with two video cameras in operating room. B. (Dis)assembly time of the steerable punch performed by the scrub nurse in the operating room determined from video footage C. Questionnaire filled out by the surgeon assessing the workload[18] and ergonomic comfort (see attachment F1). D. Questionnaire filled out by the scrub nurse assessing the workload and ergonomic comfort (see attachment F1). E. Questionnaire filled out by the personnel of the sterilization department assessing workload and ergonomic comfort (see attachment F1). 3. Assessment of patient recovery using the IKDC (see attachment F1) 4. Assessment of postoperative complications including postoperative infection assessed at the regular follow-up two and 6 weeks postoperatively using Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) which are filled out with CASTOR as part of standard follow up of our patients. 5. Assessment of efficiency measured by: A. Time to perform solely the cutting of the meniscus, which is derived from video recording of the arthroscopic images during the operation. B. Number of repetitive actions during solely the cutting of the meniscus, i.e. repetitive reorientation of steerable punch, repetitive

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)