Long-term follow up of treatment for carpometacarpal thumb joint osteoarthritis: trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and/or tendon interposition versus pyrocarbon disc interposition

Long-term follow up of treatment for carpometacarpal thumb joint osteoarthritis: trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and/or tendon interposition versus pyrocarbon disc interposition - Treatment for CMC1 OA: trapeziectomy with LR and/or TI vs pyrodisc

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON46102

Enrollment

Registered

2018-11-19

Start date

2019-01-19

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

CMC 1 AO thumb base osteoarthritis

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Painful CMC 1 osteoarthritis at initial presentation Type II and III according to Eaton's classification on x-ray at initial presentation Minimum of 3 months nonsurgical treatment before treatment with operation Treated with trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and/or tendon interposition

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. STT osteoarthritis (type IV on Eaton*s classification) at initial presentation 2. Hyperlaxity (syndromes) 3. Systemic degenerative poly or panarthritis (RA, gout, psoriasis) 4. Less than five years after operation

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
We hypothesize that, patients who have undergone trapeziectomy combined with ligament reconstruction and/or tendon interposition compared to pyrocarbon disc interpostion: 1. Have comparable functional recovery 2. Have comparable function of the thumb with return to previous work after surgery 3. Have comparable reduction in pain after surgery 4. Show comparable satisfaction after treatment 5. Have comparable reoperations due to postoperative persisting pain	—

Measure

Time frame

We hypothesize that, patients who have undergone trapeziectomy combined with ligament reconstruction and/or tendon interposition compared to pyrocarbon disc interpostion: 1. Have comparable functional recovery 2. Have comparable function of the thumb with return to previous work after surgery 3. Have comparable reduction in pain after surgery 4. Show comparable satisfaction after treatment 5. Have comparable reoperations due to postoperative persisting pain

—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results