Skip to content

Dynamic 3D MRI for detection, quantification and evaluation of small bowel motility

Dynamic 3D MRI for detection, quantification and evaluation of small bowel motility - MOTAC

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON45985
Enrollment
42
Registered
2015-12-16
Start date
2016-02-24
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

bowel movement Gastro-intestinal motility

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Academisch Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Healthy, human volunteers who are willing to undergo minimal bowel preparation and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and who are willing to give informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: An age of less than 18 years or more than 45 years, subjects who were unable to give informed consent, the inability to hold breath for 25 seconds, history of abdominal surgery, gastrointestinal diseases or current gastrointestinal symptoms. Furthermore exclusion criteria are (relative) contraindications to undergo MRI; pacemakers, claustrophobia and pregnancy. For the subjects participating in the first part of the study additional exclusion criteria are (relative) contraindications for the use of intravenous injection of butylscopolamine. For the subjects participating in the second part of the study additional exclusion criteria are contraindications for the use of Nutridrink Juice style Apple (the motility modifying substance).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
This pilot study is to assess whether these 3D dynamic MRI acquisition and post-processing techniques can be used as a tool to detect and quantify small bowel motility. The main outcome parameter is detection of small bowel motility.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcome parameter is the validation and comparison of the two methods by demonstrating the effects of motility modification.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)