Skip to content

Measuring cognitive schemas in sexual offenders with self-report and implicit associations

Measuring cognitive schemas in sexual offenders with self-report and implicit associations - Measuring cognitive schemas in sexual offenders

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON45954
Enrollment
540
Registered
2016-01-20
Start date
2016-04-25
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

offense-supported beliefs cognitive distortions deviant sexual thoughts

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Universiteit van Tilburg
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Sexual offenders: Forensic psychiatric patient in an in- or outpatient forensic institution who have committed a hands-on sexual index offence and are age * 18.;Violent offenders: Forensic psychiatric patient in an in- or outpatient forensic institution who have committed a violent index offence in BOOG category 5-7 or 10-12 (aggravated assault, assault/battery and the possession of a weapon, violent property offence, manslaughter, arson and murder) and are age * 18.;Adult men from the general population: Age * 18;(please also consult part 4.1 & 4.2 of the protocol)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria are: Other sexual offenses (i.e., exhibitionism, voyeurism) / other violent offences, an IQ

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
There are several primary outcomes, namely (1) participant*s score on the ITs and offence-supported beliefs as measured by the QUITSO, the Molest scale, the RMAS, and the Indirect measures (the change in response latency).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The secondary outcomes are participant*s tendency for desirable responding (score on BIDR).

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)