Midflexion Instability and Functional Outcome after TKA: Flexion First Balancer versus Measured Resection technique. The MIFO study

Midflexion Instability and Functional Outcome after TKA: Flexion First Balancer versus Measured Resection technique. The MIFO study - MIFO study

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON45912

Enrollment

Registered

2018-09-05

Start date

2018-10-19

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee replacement surgery osteoartritis of the knee

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Primairy TKA placement, cruciated retained, minimal 1 year postoperative

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Total hip or contralateral total knee replacement surgery in the past year

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Primary study parameter will be the difference in midflexion laxity between the two groups measured in millimeters on the medial or lateral side with either valgus or varus stress in 30 degrees of knee flexion.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Secondary study parameters are the differences in outcome between the two group regarding the 3 functional tests: (6 minute walk test, stair climb test, static Quadriceps power test). Furthermore, quality-of-live assessment via the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire and specific instability complains of the knee, via the Lysholm questionnaire, will be compared between the two groups.	—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results