Skip to content

0-phobia: Towards a virtual cure for specific phobias

0-phobia: Towards a virtual cure for specific phobias - 0-phobia

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON45728
Enrollment
154
Registered
2017-02-22
Start date
2017-03-29
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

acrophobia and fear of heights

Interventions

The intervention 0-phobia is 3-week self-help virtual reality (VR) exposure therapy for fear of heights, that is delivered through a smartphone application (app) in combination with rudimentary card

Sponsors

Vrije Universiteit
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: -scoring above 45.45 on the AQ-Anxiety -are between 18-64 years old -have access to a smart phone (Android) and internet -willing to participate in the research study and providing informed consent -willing to fill in questionnaires (4 times)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study: -present with symptoms of severe depression or suicidality respectively as measured with the PHQ-9; total score > 19 or a score 3 on the suicidal ideation question of the WSQ (Donker et al. 2009) -have insufficient knowledge of the Dutch language -are under current treatment for specific phobia or psychotropic medication (unless on stable dosage for the previous 3 months and no changes planned during the study period)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The main parameter will be the Acrophobia Questionnaire (AQ, Cohen; 1977) subscale anxiety, a 20-item self-report questionnaire to measure fear of heights (fear and avoidance). The 20-item anxiety subscale has a 7-point Likert scale (*not anxious* to *extremely anxious*), total score 0-120. The questionnaire is widely-used and has good psychometric properties (Cohen, 1977). This measure will be given at baseline, post-test and follow-up and takes 5 minutes to complete. To be considered for inclusion, individuals have to score at least a 45.45 on the AQ-Anxiety (one standard deviation below the mean of a previous acrophobic sample; Cohen, 1972; Steinman and Teachman, 2011)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary parameters are: * The Attitudes Towards Heights Questionnaire (ATHQ; originally Abelson & Curtis, 1989, with minor modifications to the wording reported in Coehlo, Santos, Silvério, & Silva, 2006) is a 6-item measure in which individuals read pairs of dichotomous adjectives describing ways people may feel about heights (e.g., *Good/Bad,* *Safe/Dangerous*), and rate how they feel about elevated places on a scale of 0 (which corresponds with the first adjective) to 10 (which corresponds with the second adjective). The ATHQ has been used in several height fear treatment studies and is sensitive to treatment effects (Coehlo et al., 2006; Emmelkamp, Bruynzeel, Drost, & van der Mast, 2001). Reliability is good (Steinman & Teachman, 2014). * Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI; Beck et al., 1988) is a 21-item self-report questionnaire assessing symptoms of anxiety. Patients record how much they have been bothered by each symptom during the past week, including the day the questionnaire is administered. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = not at all to 3 = severely: I could barely stand it. The total score ranges from 0 to 63. The following guidelines are recommended for the interpretation of scores: 0*9, normal or no anxiety; 10*18, mild to moderate anxiety; 19*29, moderate to severe anxiety; and 30*63, severe anxiety. Internal consistency is high (0.90-0.94) and convergent validity is good (Brown et al., 1997). * Igroup Presence Questionnaire (IPQ; Schubert, Friedmann and Regenbrecht 2001), a 14-item questionnaire which assess realism and *presence* in the VR environment. Each of the items has five response categories from fully disagree (1) to fully agree (5). Chronbach`s alpha is good (* = .73). This questionnaire will be completed at post-test. * System Usability Scale (SUS; Bangor et al., 2008): 10 items about user friendliness of the online intervention. The SUS is composed of 10 statements that are scored on a

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)