Implicit and explicit motor learning during gait rehabilitation and the use of simple technologies to support independent gait training at home in people after stroke.

Implicit and explicit motor learning during gait rehabilitation and the use of simple technologies to support independent gait training at home in people after stroke. - Implicit motor learning in gait training after stroke

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON45557

Enrollment

Registered

2017-02-23

Start date

2017-05-19

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

CVA stroke

Interventions

Work package A consists of a 3-week intervention period that includes 3 training sessions per week. The experimental group receives gait training based on implicit learning principles (analogy Learn

gait

motor learning

rehabilitation

stroke

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 64 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: * has had a stroke and is in the chronic stage of recovery (> 6 months after stroke) * wants to improve his/her walking performance * has a walking speed slower than 1.0 m/s (there is limited space for improvement if walking speed would be too high (ceiling effect)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: * cannot walk a minimal distance of 10 meters (if necessary with manual assistance or walking aid) * has additional impairments, not related to stroke, that can influence the gait pattern e.g. severe osteoarthritis or amputation of the lower limb

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The main outcome parameter in work package A is walking speed measured in single and dual task conditions. The main outcome parameter for work package B is the technology acceptance of the Stappy-system.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Secondary outcome measures in work package A include: quality of gait (Spatiotemporal gait parameters, Dynamic Gait Index), the participants satisfaction? (Likert-scale), the general level of mobility (Rivermead Mobility Index) and quality of life (Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale). Secondary outcomes in work package B are based on the feasibility and potential first effects on walking performance.	—

Measure

Time frame

Secondary outcome measures in work package A include: quality of gait (Spatiotemporal gait parameters, Dynamic Gait Index), the participants *satisfaction?* (Likert-scale), the general level of mobility (Rivermead Mobility Index) and quality of life (Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale). Secondary outcomes in work package B are based on the feasibility and potential first effects on walking performance.

—

Countries

The Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)