FindTrial
Sign In

User-friendliness of *ArthroSave*s Knee-Reviver* compared to *Stryker mono-tubes* in case of knee distraction as treatment for knee osteoarthritis.

User-friendliness of *ArthroSave*s Knee-Reviver* compared to *Stryker mono-tubes* in case of knee distraction as treatment for knee osteoarthritis. - User-friendly knee-distraction

Status
Unknown
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON45556
Enrollment
30
Registered
2017-07-12
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

knee osteoarthritis

Interventions

knee distraction with ArthroSave's KneeReviver
distraction
knee
osteoarthritis

Sponsors

Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 64 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - adults *65 years of age (at higher ages cost-benefit is becoming less; 15) - BMI 40/100 (conservative treatment resistant)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: General: Patients that would not be considered for arthroplasty or osteotomy because of psychosocial condition; or who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study: - Comorbidities that would compromise the efficacy of knee joint distraction (arbitrary defined by orthopaedic surgeons) - History of inflammatory or septic arthritis - Knee mal-alignment of more than 10 degrees - Previous surgical interventions of the index knee

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
duration needed to place the distraction frame—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
questionnaire regarding user friendliness for the patient—

Countries

The Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)