Skip to content

LAVA: Liver resection surgery versus thermal Ablation for colorectal liVer metAstases.

LAVA: Liver resection surgery versus thermal Ablation for colorectal liVer metAstases. - LAVA

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON45285
Enrollment
80
Registered
2017-12-14
Start date
2017-07-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver metastases tumor growth in the liver

Interventions

Liver resection will be carried out within regional centres according to individual centre protocol. The majority of patients will have undergone resection of the primary cancer. Patients may be off
Colorectal liver metastases
Liver resection surgery
Thermal ablation

Sponsors

Universiteit Maastricht
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 64 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Aged >= 18 years 2. Able to provide written informed consent 3. MDT diagnosis of colorectal liver metastases considered to be resectable or ablatable with curative intent 4. Resected colorectal primary or plan for primary resection with curative intent 5. Meets one or more of the following criteria: i) Considered high risk for surgery due to age e.g. age greater than 70 years. ii) Major co-morbidities as judged by the treating clinician. e.g. previous Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA), major cerebrovascular accidents (CVA), myocardial infarction (MI), severe chronic airway disease, previous pulmonary embolism (PE), chronic kidney disease. iii) Liver metastases with poor prognosis e.g. requiring down staging with chemotherapy prior to definitive treatment, poor response after chemotherapy but still resectable and ablatable, curable extra-hepatic disease , multiple synchronous metastases, previous treated lung metastases (resection or ablation). iv) High risk surgery, e.g. need two staged resection or ALPPS or portal vein embolization, small anticipated remnant liver volume. v) Recurrence of colorectal liver metastases following previous surgery or ablation 6. Suitable candidate for either liver resection surgery or thermal ablation as judged by the MDT 7. Able and willing to comply with the terms of the protocol including QoL questionnaires

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Incurable extra-hepatic metastases 2. Not a suitable candidate for liver resection surgery 3. Not a suitable candidate for thermal ablation 4. Concurrent malignant disease (except basal cell carcinoma) 5. Planned simultaneous resection of primary and liver metastases 6. Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
• Disease free survival (measured from randomisation) at 2 years post-randomisation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• Overall survival at 2 and 5 years • Local and distant recurrence of disease at 2 years • Disease free survival (measured from end of intervention) at 2 years post-randomisation • Use of subsequent therapies for treatment failure • Health related quality of life (QoL) • Complications during treatment • Post treatment complications • Length of intensive therapy unit (ITU) and inpatient stay • Cost effectiveness (UK only) • Explore the association between tumour markers and recurrence

Countries

The Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)