Skip to content

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus open abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: A long-term follow-up on quality of life and anatomical result

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus open abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: A long-term follow-up on quality of life and anatomical result - SALTO-1: Long-term follow-up

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON45282
Enrollment
74
Registered
2017-04-04
Start date
2017-07-13
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

pelvic organ prolapse

Interventions

pelvic organ prolapse
vault prolapse

Sponsors

Maxima Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 64 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - All patients from the original SALTO trial. - Willing to participate.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Deceased patients - Unwilling to participate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome of this study is the long-term disease specific quality of life, measured using the Dutch validated version of the Urinary Distress Inventory.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes will be patient*s subjective satisfaction, general quality of life, sexual functioning, subjective recurrence, objective recurrence using the POP-Q classification, type and number of re-interventions and complications on the long term.

Countries

The Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)