hip osteoarthritis hip prosthesis
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Patients aged between 35 and 70 years Patients requiring uncemented primary THA Patients with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, avascular necrosis or post-traumatic arthritis
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Patients who require a revision of previous implanted THA Patients with BMI>35 Patients who have had a prior procedure of femoral osteotomy patients with active or suspected infection patients with malignancy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The primary objective is to determine the prosthetic migration of the uncemented Trident acetabular component (Tritanium or HA coated (controls)) and the uncemented HA coated Symax stem from post-op until 2 years after implantation using the model based RSA technique. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The secondary objective of this study is to asses clinical outcome and patient satisfaction in patients implanted with the uncemented Trident acetabular component (Tritanium or HA coated (controls)) and the uncemented HA-coated Symax hip stem from post-op until 2 years after implantation using the Harris Hip Score, Oxford Hip Score, WOMAC and EQ-5D questionnaires at pre-op, 12w, 26w, 52w and 104w. The tertiary objective of this study is to assess bone remodeling of the uncemented Trident acetabular component (Tritanium or HA coated (controls)) and the uncemented HA-coated Symax hip stem from post-op until 2 years after implantation using QCT derived from using F18-Fluoride PET (Positron Emission Tomography) in a cohort of 12 consecutive patients (to be exact patients 11-23 in inclusion scheme) at 12, 26, 52 and 104 weeks post-op. The fourth objective of this study is to determine prosthetic migration and patient satisfaction at 5 years after surgery. A hip implant that is initially properly fixed to the bone, can show micromovement after some years. This can be a first sign of loosening, resulting in implant failure. So 5 year post-operative evaluation is important to confirm quality and safety of this implant as well as to determine the predictive capacity of RSA in terms of mid- and long term implant survival. | — |
Countries
Netherlands