Skip to content

A prospective study to a blended ACT e-health training in curative treated breastcancer patients with distress: results and patient reports.

A prospective study to a blended ACT e-health training in curative treated breastcancer patients with distress: results and patient reports. - Living to the full with breastcancer

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON44742
Enrollment
50
Registered
2015-10-28
Start date
2016-07-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

distress-klachten distress feeling uncomfortable

Interventions

Training Living to the full with breastcancer. This is a twelf week training, patients do it by there self, at home behind there computer. They will get information about Acceptance and Commitment T

Sponsors

Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Breastcancer patients who has been treated curative.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Severe psychopathology (for example suicidality). Younger than 18 years old. Breastcancerpatients treated palliative.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary outcome of the study is the level of well-being, measured by the MHC-sf and the level of distress, measured by the HADS. - Is there a significant increase in the level of well-being? - Is there a significant decrease in the leve of distress?

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secundary outcome of the study are the subscales from the MHC-sf. Is there a significant increase in the level of emotional well-being? Is there a significant increase in the level of psychological well-being? Is there a significant increase in the level of social well-being? As well there wil be investigated if the level of psychological flexibility and engaged living will increase. When training is finished patients will be asked to evaluate the training. Is there an increasing level of psychological flexibility? Is there an increasing level of engaged living? How do patients evaluate the training? How do the participants evaluate the training?

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)