Comparison between stented, stentless and transcatheter aortic valve bioprostheses using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging

Comparison between stented, stentless and transcatheter aortic valve bioprostheses using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging - Aortic valve bioprostheses in 4D flow MR

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON44677

Enrollment

Registered

2014-10-29

Start date

2014-12-14

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

aortic valve bioprostheses prosthetic heart valve

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adult patients who had an aortic valve replacement with a Mitroflow or SOLO bioprotheses, or a transcatheter aortic valve implantation with an Edwards Sapien.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Multiple valve replacements Contraindication for MRI (see protocol for specification)

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
maximum and average flow velocity, flow pattern and wall shear stress and kinetic energy loss over the aortic valve	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
nvt	—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results