Skip to content

Effect of Computer-Controlled Cooling on Surgical Aspects after a Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fracture (Cool-DIACF); A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of Computer-Controlled Cooling on Surgical Aspects after a Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fracture (Cool-DIACF); A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial - Cool-DIACF

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON44652
Enrollment
36
Registered
2015-10-29
Start date
2016-10-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Calcaneal fracture

Interventions

Patients will be equally randomized to two groups: 1) Computer-controlled cooling brace 2) Pressure bandage

Sponsors

Erasmus MC, Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with a displaced (> 2 mm step-off in posterior facet), intra-articular calcaneal fracture (Sanders type II-IV or OTA type 82C2-4 (8); confirmed on X-ray (lateral and AP with Brodèn view) or CT) 2. Indication for ORIF using an extended lateral or sinus tarsi approach 3. Adult men or women aged 18 years or older 4. Hospital presentation within two days after trauma 5. Provision of informed consent by patient

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with a existing condition that result in asymmetrical morphometric characteristics of the distal part of either one of the lower legs 2. Additional traumatic injuries that might influence extremity volume (e.g., lower extremity fracture, pelvic fracture) 3. Patients with bilateral calcaneal fractures 4. Patients with a pathological, recurrent, or open calcaneal fracture 5. Patients with decreased sensory function in any leg that might affect pain sensation. 6. Patients unfit for surgery 7. Patients unwilling or unable to comply with the intervention or follow-up visit schedule 8. Insufficient comprehension of Dutch or English language to understand rehabilitation programs and other treatment information in the judgment of the attending physician 9. Participation in another surgical intervention or drug study that might influence any of the outcome parameters

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time to surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Preoperative and postoperative pain Preoperative and postoperative swelling Preoperative and postoperative foot/ankle circumference Postoperative hospital length of stay Satisfaction with the approach to reduce swelling Adverse events within three months after surgery

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)