Top-Down Enrichment of Speech Perception

Top-Down Enrichment of Speech Perception - ENRICH-MUS

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON44424

Enrollment

162

Registered

2018-02-08

Start date

2018-04-05

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

cochlear implant hearing impairment

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Normal hearing musicians and non-musicians: - normal hearing: audiometry with hearing level * 20 db HL pure-tone thresholds from 250 to 8000 Hz bilaterally - older than 18 years or more - native speaker of Dutch - Have no vision deficit (corrected to normal vision) and be able to manipulate a mouse or use a touchscreen.;The musician criteria for the participants are the following: - onset of musical training: no later than at 7.5 years of age - having at least 10 years of music training - at least 3 years of musical training before participating in the study;Hearing Impaired/cochlear implant (CI) user -use of hearing aid/CI or not, as well as information regarding the level of hearing provided by the clinicians

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: -Dyslexia -Non-native Dutch speakers -For the NH group, participants who have abnormal audiometric pure-tone average thresholds in the better ear (Stephens, 1996). This will be measured during the first session. -All subjects who show signs of claustrophobia

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The main study parameters of this study will be the differences in NH and HI musicians and non-musicians on behavioral, eye-tracking, pupil dilation and EEG responses, and the individual profiles of these groups when the experimental findings across experiments are combined. These include the following: * relation between psychoacoustic measures and more higher-level cognitive processes, such as the time course of linguistic processing and listening effort in eye-tracking, pupil dilation and EEG measures * individual differences based on different musical expertise * group differences between different musicians and means of groups of same musical expertise * relations between the collected measures with measures of psychoacoustic sensitivities	—

Measure

Time frame

The main study parameters of this study will be the differences in NH and HI musicians and non-musicians on behavioral, eye-tracking, pupil dilation and EEG responses, and the individual profiles of these groups when the experimental findings across experiments are combined. These include the following: * relation between psychoacoustic measures and more higher-level cognitive processes, such as the time course of linguistic processing and listening effort in eye-tracking, pupil dilation and EEG measures * individual differences based on different musical expertise * group differences between different musicians and means of groups of same musical expertise * relations between the collected measures with measures of psychoacoustic sensitivities

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
none	—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results