Head to head comparison between Rubidium-82 myocardial perfusing imaging with a digital and analog PET system

Head to head comparison between Rubidium-82 myocardial perfusing imaging with a digital and analog PET system - ORDINATE

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON44392

Enrollment

Registered

2017-12-21

Start date

2017-12-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

atherosclerotic heart disease ischemic heart disease

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient has been refered for Rb-82 PET imaging on a conventional PET Has to be able to follow the instructions and preparations as needed for additional PET imaging Able to lie in supine position for 40 minutes >= 18 years of age Has to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: A potential subject in whom informed consent is not obtained or does not meet the other inclusion criteria will be excluded from participation in this study. In addition, patients requiring dobutamine for stress imaging because of intolerance of regadenoson (extremely rare) are also excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1) The image quality scored on a four points scale, 2) The visibility of perfusion deficits (existence, location and size) and 3) myocardial blood flow (global and three coronary trajectories)	—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results