Implementing Self management using eHealth for monitoring and management after Catheter ablation in the treatment of Atrial fibrillatioN. A study on the diagnostic accuracy and the effects of eHealth rhythm monitoring on patient related outcomes, clinical management and health outcomes.

Implementing Self management using eHealth for monitoring and management after Catheter ablation in the treatment of Atrial fibrillatioN. A study on the diagnostic accuracy and the effects of eHealth rhythm monitoring on patient related outcomes, clinical management and health outcomes. - iSCAN

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON44247

Enrollment

100

Registered

2018-03-01

Start date

2018-07-20

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

atrialfibrillation

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: * Patients 18 years and over * a history of documented palpitation driven paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation. * Scheduled for index PVI procedure * Already utilises a smartphone or tablet compatible with required software prior to enrolment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: * Patients monitored with continuous heart rhythm monitor (e.g. PM, ICD, ILR) * Participation in a conflicting study

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Effect on post-PVI management: - Arrhythmia detection (AF, Aflut, AT, SVT) - Time until arrhythmia detection - Medication management (AAD, OAC) - Time until discontinuation AAD and OAC - Healthcare Consumption	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
- diagnostic accuracy studie 1) sensitivity 2) specificity 3) positive and negative predicting values 4) Cohens kappa Kardia - Holter, Kardia application - Cardiologist - Usefulness and applicability eHealth 1) ease of use 2) availability when demanded 3) technical quality 4) compliance 5) User satisfaction (patient and physician) 6) Quality of Life	—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results