Skip to content

Evaluation of Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification (VTIQ - 2D-SWE) in the Assessment of BI-RADS® 3 and 4 lesions: Can patient selection for biopsy be improved? - A confirmatory Multi-Center-Study

Evaluation of Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification (VTIQ - 2D-SWE) in the Assessment of BI-RADS® 3 and 4 lesions: Can patient selection for biopsy be improved? - A confirmatory Multi-Center-Study - VTIQ

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON43355
Enrollment
100
Registered
2016-09-05
Start date
2017-09-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

breast lesion breast tumor

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Female Age >=18 years Patients with a lesion >= 0.5 cm, initially scored BI-RADS® 3, 4a, 4b or 4c in B-mode ultrasound Signed informed consent of study participation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnant or lactating women Women with breast implants on the same side as the lesion Women that underwent local radiation or chemotherapy within the last 12 months Women with history of breast cancer or breast surgery in the same quadrant Lesions in or close to scar tissue (

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1) To assess whether ultrasonically visualized breast lesions, categorized as BI-RADS® 4a, with a VTIQ-measured shear velocity value of smaller than or equal to 3.5 m/s (37 kPa), show a lower malignancy rate than BI-RADS® 4a with a VTIQ-measured shear velocity value of larger than 3.5 m/s (37 kPa). 2) To assess whether the malignancy rate of ultrasonically visualized breast lesions categorized as BI-RADS® 4a with a VTIQ-measured shear velocity value of smaller than or equal to 3.5 m/s (37 kPa) is below 2%. 3) To assess whether the malignancy rate of ultrasonically visualized breast lesions categorized as BI-RADS® 3 with a VTIQ-measured shear velocity value of smaller than or equal to 3.5 m/s (37 kPa) is below 2%.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1) To assess whether ultrasonically visualized breast lesions, categorized as BI-RADS® 3 with a VTIQ-measured shear velocity value of smaller than or equal to 3.5 m/s (37 kPa), show a lower malignancy rate than BI-RADS® 3 with a VTIQ-measured shear velocity value of larger than 3.5 m/s (37 kPa). 2) To assess whether ultrasonically visualized breast lesions, categorized as BI-RADS® 4b with a VTIQ-measured shear velocity value of smaller than or equal to 3.5 m/s (37 kPa), show a lower malignancy rate than BI-RADS® 4b with a VTIQ-measured shear velocity value of larger than 3.5 m/s (37 kPa). 3) To assess whether ultrasonically visualized breast lesions, categorized as BI-RADS® 4c with a VTIQ-measured shear velocity value of smaller than or equal to 3.5 m/s (37 kPa), show a lower malignancy rate than BI-RADS® 4c with a VTIQ-measured shear velocity value of larger than 3.5 m/s (37 kPa). 4) To assess whether the probabilities for malignancies predicted with ultrasonically visualized breast lesions categorized according to BI-RADS® differ from the probabilities for malignancies predicted with ultrasonically visualized breast lesions categorized with the help of VTIQ only or by a combination of BI-RADS® and VTIQ measurements. 5) To assess whether for women with ultrasonically visualized breast lesions categorized as BI-RADS® 3, 4a, 4b or 4c, respectively, the subgroup of women with a strain ratio smaller than or equal to 1 shows a lower malignancy rate than the subgroup of women with a strain ratio larger than 1. 6) To assess the VTIQ intra-rater reliability for the original continuous scale and the dichotomized values. 7) To assess, in a subgroup with valid VTIQ results, the reproducibility of VTIQ shear velocity measurements made on the same lesion in different examinations performed on the same day by different operators. To assess the VTIQ inter-rater reliability for the original continuous scale and the dichotomized values. 8) To assess pred

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)