Validation of an Oesophageal Doppler Cardiac Output Monitor (ODM) versus a Transpulmonary Thermodilution Cardiac Output Monitor (PiCCO).

Validation of an Oesophageal Doppler Cardiac Output Monitor (ODM) versus a Transpulmonary Thermodilution Cardiac Output Monitor (PiCCO). - ODM vs PiCCO

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON43157

Enrollment

Registered

2016-12-21

Start date

2017-08-24

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

cardiac output

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Age

2 Years to 17 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria are intubated and sedated patients aged 0 to 16 years with an indication for CO monitoring in the pediatric intensive care (PICU) or the operating room (OR) at the Radboud University Medical Centre.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria are refusal of participation, congenital or acquired cardiovascular diseases (intracardiac/extracardiac intrathoracic shunt, cardiac valve diseases, aortic arch anomalies), age > 16 years and weight 50 kg.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Values of cardiac output (PiCCO and ODM), peak-flow velocities and flow-time integral (ODM)	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
nvt	—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results