Skip to content

Catheter Cryoablation versus Antiarrhythmic Drug as First-Line Therapy of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Catheter Cryoablation versus Antiarrhythmic Drug as First-Line Therapy of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation - CRYO-FIRST

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON42900
Enrollment
26
Registered
2016-12-22
Start date
2017-10-26
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation Cryo ablation

Interventions

Cryo-ablation in the pulmonary vein

Sponsors

Medtronic B.V.
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: * Subject has been diagnosed with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation as defined above and at least two symptomatic episodes in the last six months prior to inclusion. * At least one episode of AF must be documented during the prior year by any kind of ECG recording. * Subject has structural normal heart with an LVEF * 50%, thickness of the inter-ventricular septum *12 mm and left atrium diameters (short axis)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: * Subject developed persistent AF at least once in history (electrical or pharmacological cardioversion after 48h or episode duration >7 days). * Subject has documented typical atrial flutter. * Subject has any history of successful or unsuccessful treatment of AF with class I or III antiarrhythmic or sotalol with the intention to prevent an AF recurrence. Patients pretreated with above AAD at maximum 48 hours with the intention to convert an AF episode are allowed. * Subject had any previous left atrial ablation. * Subject had any previous cardiac surgery, e.g. prosthetic valves. * Subject has permanent pacemaker or defibrillator implant. * Subject has 2° type II, 3° degree AV-block or left/right bundle branch block pattern. * Subject has unstable angina pectoris. * Subject has history of previous myocardial infarction or percutaneous intervention during the last three months. * Subject has symptomatic carotid stenosis. * Subject has chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with detected pulmonary hypertension or any other evidence of significant lung disease. * Subject has any contraindication for oral anticoagulation. * Subject has any history of previous transient ischemic attack or stroke. * Subject has known intra-cardiac thrombus formation. * Subject has any significant congenital heart defect corrected or not (except for patent foramen ovale that is allowed). * Subject has evidence of congestive heart failure (NYHA class II, III or IV) in sinus rhythm. * Subject has hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. * Subject has abnormal long or short QT interval, signs of Brugada syndrome, known inheriting ion channel disease on the family, arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. * Subject has sarcoidosis. * Subject has pulmonary vein stent. * Subject has myxoma.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary endpoint is freedom from any atrial arrhythmia recurrence at 12 months (at least one episode of AF, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia with a duration > 30 seconds documented by 7 day Holter ECG or any other printed ECG recording following a blanking period or a dosing optimizing period of 3 months).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary endpoint 1 The quality of life of the two arms measured by SF-36 Health Survey and Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-Life (AFEQT) questionnaires will be compared at 12 months follow-up. Secondary endpoint 2 Hospital or emergency services accesses due to symptoms caused by documented atrial arrhythmias will be compared in the two arms at 12 months follow-up. Secondary endpoint 3 Freedom from occurrence of AF (after 3 months blanking period) will be compared between the two arms at 12 months follow-up. Secondary endpoint 4 Freedom from occurrence of documented left atrial tachycardia and typical - or atypical left atrial flutter (after 3 months blanking period or AAD optimization period) will be compared between the two arms at 12 months follow-up. Secondary endpoint 5 Symptomatic palpitations burden will be evaluated by mean of Patient*s diary information and compared between the two arms at 12 months follow-up. Secondary endpoint 6 Severe adverse events incidence will be compared between the two arms during the whole course of the study. Secondary endpoint 7 Freedom from persistent AF (AF episode lasting longer than 7 days or interrupted by pharmacological or electrical cardioversion after 48h from the onset of the episode) will be compared between the two arms at 12 months follow-up. Secondary endpoint 8 Echocardiographic left atrial parameters will be compared between the two arms at 6 and 12 months follow ups. Secondary endpoint 9 Frequency, type and associated cost of health care utilization will be compared between the two arms at 12 months follow-up.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)