Skip to content

Cervical split laminectomy vs conventional cervical laminectomy for treatment of cervical myelopathy

Cervical split laminectomy vs conventional cervical laminectomy for treatment of cervical myelopathy - Cervical split laminectomy for treatment of cervical myelopathy

Status
Unknown
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON42752
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2015-09-15
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

spinal canal narrowing

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Sint Lucas Andreas Ziekenhuis
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: all patients who underwent a cervical split laminectomy because of cervical myelopathy between the first of januari 2004 and 31 december 2013 in the SLAZ (Sint Lucas Andreas Hospital).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: No medical data available pre-operative MRI of fluoroscopie not available Cervical operation in patients history Operation because of other reason then cervical spondylotic myelopathy Applying cevical spondylodesis during operation Additional neurological impairment congentical misformed cervical spine Patient is deceased patient is not available patient gave no informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Baseline and short-term functional status was scored via a questionnaire, the Nurick outcome scale. Long-term follow-up functional status was scored by means of a set of questionnaires: The Nurick outcome scale, the adjusted JOA scale and Neck disability index. Preoperative fluoroscopy and MRI of the cervical spine were evaluated. The fluoroscopy was used to determine the presence of kyphosis and segmental instability using the methods of, Matsumoto and Knopp respectively. The preoperative MRI was evaluated to confirm the diagnosis of spondylotic myelopathy, to count the number of stenotic levels and to assess the presence of any lesions in the spinal cord. Moreover, the compression ratio of all cervical levels was measured by dividing the sagittal diameter of the medulla by the transverse diameter

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
At long-term follow-up a lateral and a flexion-extension fluoroscopy was obtained and evaluated for the presence of kyphosis and segmental instability. Anteroposition of more than 2 mm of two adjacent corpora occurring upon motion was considered as segmental instability. In addition, prospective data of the perceived recovery were retrieved from a questionnaire at long-term follow-up, at least 3 year postoperatively

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)