Skip to content

Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) Therapy in Subjects with Medically Refractory Heart Failure: A Randomized Efficacy Study (*IMPULSE-HF*)

Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) Therapy in Subjects with Medically Refractory Heart Failure: A Randomized Efficacy Study (*IMPULSE-HF*) - IMPULSE-HF

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON42472
Enrollment
20
Registered
2016-04-05
Start date
2015-10-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

heart failure wea

Interventions

Subjects undergoing implantation of an OPTIMIZER pulse generator and associated leads will be prepared for device implantation according to the procedure of the institution. After access to the subc

Sponsors

Impulse Dynamics Inc.
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: a) Baseline ejection fraction * 25% and *45% (as assessed by the site) b) NYHA class II or III despite receiving optimal medical therapy for heart failure, stable for at least 30 days based on patient*s medical records (chronic, not transient, heart failure) c) Baseline VO2,max * 9 and * 18.5 ml O2/Kg/min

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: a) Potentially correctible cause of HF (valvular, congenital, or untreated ischemic heart disease) b) Clinically significant angina pectoris c) Hospitalization for HF requiring the use of inotropic support within 30 days of enrollment d) PR interval greater than 375 ms e) Permanent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation/flutter, or cardioversion within 30 days of enrollment. f) Exercise tolerance limited by condition other than heart failure (e.g., angina, COPD, peripheral vascular disease, orthopedic or rheumatologic conditions) or unable to perform baseline stress testing g) Scheduled for a CABG or a PTCA procedure, or CABG procedure within 90 days or a PTCA procedure within 30 days of enrollment. h) Biventricular pacing system, or indication for Biventricular pacing system i) Myocardial infarction within 90 days of enrollment. j) Mechanical tricuspid or aortic valves. k) Ventricular assist device l) Prior heart transplant m) Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study n) Age below 18 o) Subject participating in another study, unrelated to CCM, at the same time (or within 30 days prior to enrollment to this study) p) Subjects on dialysis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primarv endpoint: Comparison between the groups of change in V02 max from baseline to 24 weeks of follow-up. VO2max will be evaluated by cardiopulmonary stress test (CPX), in a double assessment (i.e., tests will be repeated twice at each study follow-up - the two evaluations can be up to 2 weeks apart).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondarv endpoints: Efficacv Comparison between the groups of: * Change in quality of life as measure by Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ), from baseline to 24 weeks. * Change in NYHA class, from baseline to 24 weeks * Change in V02max from baseline to 24 weeks for each of the following subgroups separately: Baseline EF 35% Other endpoints - exoloratory: Change in SHFM and MAGGIC survival prediction model scores from baseline to 6 month of follow-up. Safetv endpoints: Comparison between the groups of: * All-cause mortality * Cardiovascular mortality * Time to first event - cardiovascular related (death, LVAD, urgent heart transplant or unplanned heart failure hospitalization) * Time to first event - all cause (death or unplanned hospitalization)

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)