Skip to content

An early clinical feasibility study of a new prosthesis: the NewBreez® Intralaryngeal device; a possible solution for severe aspiration in head and neck cancer patients

An early clinical feasibility study of a new prosthesis: the NewBreez® Intralaryngeal device; a possible solution for severe aspiration in head and neck cancer patients - An intralaryngeal device for a dysfunctional larynx

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON42228
Enrollment
5
Registered
2015-08-24
Start date
2014-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

aspiration Dysfunctional larynx swallowing impairment

Interventions

Placement of the NewBreez® Intralaryngeal prosthesis.

Sponsors

Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Patients who have been treated successfully for HNC and are free of disease minimally one year after treatment; and - Patients with difficulties in feeding and/or breathing due to a dysfunctional larynx, necessitating prolonged (> 6 months) use of a (nasogastric or percutaneous) feeding tube and a tracheotomy, which are unlikely to be removed; and - Patients who are motivated to undergo the operation; and - Patients are willing to provide written informed consent prior to participation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Patients under the age of 18 years; or - Patients with clotting disorders; or - Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD); or - Patients with recurrent or residual HNC disease; or - Patients with upper esophageal obstruction or stenosis on videofluoroscopy; or - Patients who are unfit to undergo general anaesthesia, as judged by the anaesthetist.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Safety endpoints: o Adverse events, including adverse device effects: dislocation, damage to the larynx o Implant tolerance o Reversibility if/when removed

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Performance and efficacy endpoints: o Technical success of the implantation procedure o Implant placement and integrity, as assessed by nasopharyngoscopy o Eating (diet, oral intake and/or feeding tube dependency) o Breathing (tracheotomy dependency) o Aspiration, as assessed by direct visualization and videofluoroscopy at one week and 6 months after placement Patient satisfaction: o Quality of Life, as assessed by the SWAL-QOL questionnaire o Specific questions on tolerance and problems with the device

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)