Skip to content

The CHARACTER SCS Study: A randomised pilot study to assess differenCes in tHe subjects* experience of stimulAtion-Induced paRaesthesiA between two different spinal Cord sTimulation dEvices: the Axium® DoRsal Root Ganglion Stimulation System Versus the Prime Advanced* Dorsal Column Stimulation System

The CHARACTER SCS Study: A randomised pilot study to assess differenCes in tHe subjects* experience of stimulAtion-Induced paRaesthesiA between two different spinal Cord sTimulation dEvices: the Axium® DoRsal Root Ganglion Stimulation System Versus the Prime Advanced* Dorsal Column Stimulation System - The CHARACTER SCS Study; 12-SMI-2014

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON42046
Enrollment
40
Registered
2014-08-08
Start date
2014-10-14
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neuropathic lower limb pain Effect of stimulation on neuropathic (nerve) foot pain

Interventions

Patients will be randomised to one of the two existing treatments.

Sponsors

St. Jude Medical
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Subject is appropriate for SCS implantation according to standard criteria from the Dutch Neuromodulation Society 2) Subject is 18 to 75 years old 3) Subject is able and willing to comply with the follow-up schedule and protocol 4) Subject has chronic (> 6 months) uni/bi-lateral neuropathic pain in the lower limb(s) (below the knee) with predominant foot pain 5) Minimum baseline pain rating of 50 mm on the VAS in the primary region of pain 6) Subject is able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Subject has no other exclusion criteria for SCS implantation according to standard criteria from the Dutch Neuromodulation Society 2) Subject has had corticosteroid therapy at an intended site of stimulation within the past 30 days 3) Subject has had radiofrequency treatment of an intended target DRG within the past 3 months 4) Subject has participated in another clinical study within 30 days 5) Subject has been previously treated with and failed to respond to an implantable neuromodulation therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary objective of this study is to compare subject experiences of SCS with the two different therapies. We have defined 4 separate assessment tools, which combined, evaluate the primary endpoint of this study: • Change in perceived stimulation intensity during normal changes in body posture (Standing/Sitting and Lying) • Average number of device activations per day • Assessment (%) of how much of a subject*s painful area is covered by the stimulation induced paraesthesia • Assessment (%) of how much of a subjects non-painful area is also covered by the stimulation induced paraesthesia

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• Validation of the Paraesthesia Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) • Foot / Lower Limb Pain Relief (Visual Analogue Scale) • Quality of life (EQ-5D-3L) • Physical functioning (BPI) • Sleep quality (Bespoke scale created specifically for pain patients treated with neurostimulation, currently being validated in other on going studies) • Subject satisfaction (7 Point Likert Scale) • Device safety by monitoring events according to MEDDEV 2.12-1, rev 8 • Pain medication utilisation (Simple notation of current usage through study period)

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)