Skip to content

Preoperative endoscopic versus percutaneous biliary drainage in potentially resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: DRAINAGE Trial

Preoperative endoscopic versus percutaneous biliary drainage in potentially resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: DRAINAGE Trial - DRAINAGE Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON41627
Enrollment
106
Registered
2013-09-02
Start date
2013-09-26
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Klatskin tumor perihilar bile duct tumor Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

Interventions

The index drainage procedure is scheduled at 5 days after treatment allocation. EBD consists of an endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and placement of a plastic endoprosthesis through the stenosi

Sponsors

Academisch Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Diagnosis of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma • No apparent signs of irresectability on CT-scan and/or MRI, and scheduled to undergo a *curative* liver resection (may need additional lymph node biopsies or a diagnostic laparoscopy to further determine resectability); • Inadequate preoperative biliary drainage. For drainage naïve patients this is defined as: * Serum bilirubin level >= 50 µmol/l; For drainage non-naïve patients this is defined as: * Persistent hyperbilirubinemia * or inadequate drainage of the future remnant liver (stent positioned in contra-lateral side) • Both the endoscopic and the percutaneous drainage methods are technically feasible.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Incomplete recovery from side-effects of any prior stenting attempt, including signs of active cholangitis. • ECOG/WHO score >=3 • Any other contraindication for major liver surgery • No informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The number of drainage related complications between treatment allocation and explorative laparotomy. Complications in this composite endpoint are consist of: - Stent dysfunction - Cholangitis - Acute cholecystitis - Acute pancreatitis - Hemorrhage - Perforation - Portal vein thrombosis - Dehydration

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
- The individual components of the primary endpoint, with special interest to the incidence of preoperative cholangitis; - The number of drainage procedures required to achieve technical success; - The total number of drainage procedures that involved (attempts at) stent (re-)placement; - The proportion of patients with therapeutic success at 7 days after technical success; - The interval bilirubin decrease at 7 days and 14 days after technical success, relative to the reference level at randomization; - The bilirubin level at explorative laparotomy; - The number of days between randomization and explorative laparotomy; - The number of patients with rescheduled or cancelled laparotomy for clinical reasons; - Quality of Life (for details about QOL assessment please refer to §9); - Post-laparotomy mortality, defined as 90-day mortality after explorative laparotomy; - Post-laparotomy morbidity, defined as any complication from table 3 that occurs within 90 days after explorative laparotomy.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)