Skip to content

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of oral cebranopadol versus morphine sulfate PR in subjects with chronic moderate to severe pain related to cancer.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of oral cebranopadol versus morphine sulfate PR in subjects with chronic moderate to severe pain related to cancer. - CORAL study

Status
Unknown
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON41472
Enrollment
25
Registered
2013-07-04
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pijn bij kanker pain related to cancer

Interventions

Subjects who comply with all inclusion criteria and do not meet any of the exclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to one of the 2 treatment arms (Cebranopadol versus Morphine sulfate PR) in th

Sponsors

Grunenthal
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Subjects must have signed an informed consent form (ICF) indicating that they understand the purpose of and procedures required for the trial and are willing to participate in the trial. 2. Subjects must be at least 18 years of age at the Enrollment Visit (Visit 1). 3. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at Visit 1 and Visit 2 and must not be lactating at Visit 1. Subjects must be willing to use medically acceptable and highly effective methods of birth control. For women of childbearing potential a medically acceptable and highly effective method of birth control is defined as any form of contraception with a low failure rate defined as

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Evidence of ongoing alcohol/drug abuse or history of alcohol/drug abuse within the last 2 years in the investigator*s judgment, based on patient history and physical examination. 2. The subject has a clinically significant disease other than cancer which in the investigator's opinion may affect efficacy or safety assessments e.g., significant unstable cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurological, infectious disease, psychiatric (resulting in disorientation, memory impairment or inability to report accurately) or metabolic disorders. 3. Subjects with any gastrointestinal disorder that could, in the investigator*s opinion, affect the absorption and/or elimination of IMP. 4. Any pre-scheduled major surgery during the trial. 5. Known to or suspected of not being able to comply with the trial protocol and the use of IMP. 6. History of seizure disorder and/or epilepsy or any condition associated with a significant risk of seizure or epilepsy. 7. Known history and/or presence of cerebral tumor or cerebral metastases.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary endpoint is the average amount of daily rescue medication intake over the last 2 weeks of the Maintenance Phase.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The secondary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of subjects with clinically relevant pain reduction over the last 2 weeks of the Maintenance Phase. Definition of clinically relevant pain reduction: * Average pain intensity of

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)