Effect of hand position and feedback on cortico-spinal excitability during bilateral contractions.

Effect of hand position and feedback on cortico-spinal excitability during bilateral contractions. - Hand position and feedback on CSE

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON41301

Enrollment

Registered

2015-09-30

Start date

2015-11-10

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

fundamenteel-wetenschappelijk onderzoek not applicable

Interventions

The hand position and feedback method are varied between the force tasks. If after 5 subjects we do not see a difference in hand position or feedback, we will also vary the TMS machine between force

bilateral contractions

feedback

hand position

transcranial magnetic stimulation

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 64 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: righthandedness age: 18-35 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Neurological disorders (epilepsy) Muscle disorders Migraine

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The amplitude of the MEP. This is expressed as a percentage of the electric evoked muscle respons (M-max). The MEP amplitude is a measure of corticospinal exitability. We expect the MEP to change due to a different hand position or feedback method.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
none	—

Countries

The Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)