Skip to content

Maxilla augmentation with calvarial bone or iliac crest bone: a comparison

Maxilla augmentation with calvarial bone or iliac crest bone: a comparison - Maxilla augmentation using calvarial bone

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON41214
Enrollment
20
Registered
2014-09-08
Start date
2014-09-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

atrofy maxilla resorbed maxilla

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - edentulous patients that - cannot wear an upper denture satisfactorily - have an atrophied maxilla with insufficient bone volume to support dental implants - written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Unable to be operated on due to severe health problems - The use of intravenous bisphosphonates - Pregnant or breast-feeding - Allergic reaction in past toTetracycline

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Bone volume (%) of calvarial and iliac crest bone at time of harvesting and at time of 4 months healing

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Bone formation of calvarial and iliac crest graft at 4 months healing (micrometers per day) Third outcome: average pain and complication rate of both groups

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)