Skip to content

Urodynamic effect of Prostate Artery Embolization for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostate hyperplasia

Urodynamic effect of Prostate Artery Embolization for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostate hyperplasia - UroPE study

Status
Unknown
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON40877
Enrollment
30
Registered
2014-06-11
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

prostate hyperplasia

Interventions

30 patients with debilitating LUTS due to BPH, refractory to pharmacotherapy are selected to undergo angiographic embolization of the prostatic arteries with microspheres.

Sponsors

Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Male patients, > 40 years - Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (BPH) - Symptoms refractory tomedical therapy(*-adrenergic antagonist and 5*-reductase inhibitor for at least 6 months), or contraindication to medical therapy. - Patient must be eligible candidate for Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) - IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score) >18 and QoL >3, or both - BOR (Bladder Outlet Resistance) Schäfer grade *2 - PV (Prostate Volume) > 30 cm³. - PVR (Post-Void Residual ) * 100 ml. - Qmax ( maximum flow rate) * 15 ml/sec. - Patient has given written Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Active urinary tract infection or prostatitis 2. Suspicion of prostatic carcinoma during urologic work up for LUTS due to BPH. 3. Bladder atonia, acute urinary retention, neurogenic bladder disorder or other neurological disorder that is impacting bladder function (eg multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, spinal cord injuries, etc), 4. Urethral stricture, bladder neck contracture, sphincter abnormalities, urinary obstruction due to causes other than BPH, or other potentially confounding bladder or urethral disease or condition 5. Cystolithiasis or chronic hematuria within 3 months prior to study treatment 6. History of pelvic irradiation or radical pelvic surgery 7. Use of medication with negative effect on detrusor function. 8. Previous surgical procedures, TURP, needle ablation, microwave or laser therapy, balloon dilation, stent implantation, or any other invasive treatment to the prostate or urethra. 9. Unable to undergo Magnetic Resonance Imaging 10. Allergy to iodinated contrast agents 11. Known upper tract renal disease or GFR * 59 12. Contraindications for angiography according to the UMC Utrecht standard of practice.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome measure is the urodynamic reduction of bladder outlet obstruction. Cystometry and urodynamic pressure flow are studied by assessing the following bladder outlet resistance parameters: Schäfer grade, BOOI (Bladder Outflow Obstruction Index = Abrams-Griffiths number), and urethral resistance factor (URA; >29 cm H2O =obstructed).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Post treatment IPSS, IPSS/QOL, PV, PSA are presented as means and standard deviations or medians (interquartile ranges) and are compared to baseline. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests or a paired t-test are used for statistical analysis.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)