Skip to content

The effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycaemic control in patients undergoing major surgery

The effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycaemic control in patients undergoing major surgery - COMPAS

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON40722
Enrollment
36
Registered
2014-11-18
Start date
2015-01-02
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

glucose monitoring sensor

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Academisch Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Aged 18-85 - Diagnosed with diabetes mellitus - Able to give written informed consent - Planned for laparotomy or cardiac surgery - Will receive arterial line for standard patient care - Planned postoperative stay at PACU or ICU

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Any condition that the local investigator feels would interfere with trial participation or the evaluation of results - Allergy for heparin - Known heparin induced thrombocytopenia - Planned total panceatectomy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome measure is the difference in median glucose 1 hour after surgery, as a measure of glycaemic control during surgery. Furthermore, the time spent in the target range, time spent above the target range and time spent below the target range will be calculated.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcome measures include the accuracy of the GCM, measured by the mean absolute relative difference (MARD= (CGM value*POC/POC)). Furthermore, Clarke error grid and Bland-Altman analyses, MARD in the lower glycaemic (glucose 10 mmol/l) ranges. The ranges are according to the AMC protocol. The MARD during cardiopulmonary bypass and during the use of vasopressors will also be calculated. We will record the number of false alarms, the number of times the intravenous line has to be replaced due to failure of the device or clotting error. Also, the glucose variability, the amount of insulin used and the occurrence hypoglycaemic events (glucose

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)