Skip to content

Disposable, transnasal versus conventional upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a diagnostic accuracy study in patients referred for diagnostic evaluation of the esophagus

Disposable, transnasal versus conventional upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a diagnostic accuracy study in patients referred for diagnostic evaluation of the esophagus - SCAN study

Status
Unknown
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON40705
Enrollment
147
Registered
2014-05-06
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

esophageal lesions

Interventions

Transnasal upper endoscopy performed with the E.G.Scan 2.0 * (IntroMedic Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea) followed by conventional upper endoscopy.

Sponsors

Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Indication for diagnostic upper endoscopy to evaluate esophageal disorders - Age older than 18 years - Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Therapeutic endoscopic intervention - Known bleeding diathesis - Concurrent anticoagluation therapy - History of trauma/surgery of nose or nasal cavity - Recurrent epistaxis ( > 1 episode / 3 months) - Altered anatomy of the upper gastroesophageal tract due to suergy of the esophagus - Implantable pacing device

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Diagnostic accuracy of the E.G.Scan 2.0 * compared to conventional upper endoscopy in patients referred for diagnostic upper endoscopy as determined by sensitivity and specificity for upper GI lesions

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
- technical success - safety - quality of procedure (evaluated by the endoscopist) of the E.G.Scan 2.0 * compared to conventional upper endoscopy in patients referred for diagnostic upper endoscopy evaluate esophageal disorders

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)