Skip to content

A comparison between high and low pressure continuous closed suction drainage systems - A prospective intra-individual randomized controlled study of drainage management after chest wall masculinization in female-to-male transgenders

A comparison between high and low pressure continuous closed suction drainage systems - A prospective intra-individual randomized controlled study of drainage management after chest wall masculinization in female-to-male transgenders - High versus low pressure suction wound drainage after breast surgery

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON40288
Enrollment
35
Registered
2014-05-23
Start date
2014-09-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

wound treatment after breast surgery

Interventions

All study subjects will receive the most suitable surgical technique of chest wall masculinization based on breast tissue volume and ptosis, and skin elasticity and surplus (Cregten-Escobar et al.,
Monstrey et al., 2008). At the end of the surgery the specialist will leave one high and one low vacuum continuous closed suction drainage system in situ according to pre-operative randomization:

Sponsors

Academisch Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - aged 18 or older; - qualify for bilateral mastectomy in the context of FtM sex reassignment; - indication for post-operative drainage use; - ability to give informed consent, - willing to participate.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - shows evidence of alcohol and/or drug abuse; - has a local or general infection which could jeopardize the surgical objective; - has proven or suspected hypersensitivity to materials; - has immunosuppressive pathologies. - has (a history of) breast cancer; - has ongoing severe psychiatric illness or mental retardation or is unable to communicate adequately

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome of the study is drain production over time (first peak, (3h post-operative), first 24h post-operative and total production), up to the point of removal of the drainage system.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
- edema and fluid collection in surgical space (measured by ultrasound diagnostics); - device related adverse events (eg. blockage of drains); - daily pain and pain upon removal of the drains; - complications; - wound closure, and aesthetic result. - cost-effectiveness; - surgeon*s & (operating room) nurse*s preferences

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)