Skip to content

NOdal METastasis in high risk Endometrial Cancer (NOMETEC): detection methods and the prevalence of lymph node micrometastasis

NOdal METastasis in high risk Endometrial Cancer (NOMETEC): detection methods and the prevalence of lymph node micrometastasis - NOMETEC

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON39933
Enrollment
290
Registered
2011-07-07
Start date
2012-02-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

(high risk) endometrial cancer

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Diakonessenhuis Utrecht
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: This study is a multicenter cross-sectional diagnostic invention study, consisting of two sub-studies. ;Inclusion criteria PART I: ====================;All women, undergoing a hysteroscopic curettage and a hysterectomy because of suspicion for a (malignant) lesion of the endometrium.;Inclusion criteria PART II: ====================;Only patients with high risk endometrial cancer will be included in this study, because - according to the recently revised national guideline - standard care in these patients includes a pelvic and para-aortal lymphadenctomy. High risk patients are defined as having at least one of the following characteristics: differentiation grade 3, > 50% myometrial invasion, suspicious for extra-corporal spread, high risk histological type (serous papillary, clear cell or carcinosarcoma tumour type)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria PART I and PART II: ==============================;Patients with contraindications for open abdominal or laparoscopic surgery will be excluded: cervical or pelvic infection, severe cardio-pulmonal or other co-morbidity contra-indicating extensive surgery and anaesthesia.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary outcome parameter PART I ============================ Both techniques will be compared for: - sentinel node detection rate (min. 80% DR) - the location and level of the sentinel nodes (pelvic and/or para-aortal, high and/or low) - patient friendliness (questionnaire) - doctor friendliness (questionnaire) Primary outcome parameter PART II ============================ The reliability of the sentinel node procedure in high risk endometrial cancer, which will be determined by the false negative rate after histological examination of all removed nodes using the *gold standard* (= multiple sectioning Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC))

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcome parameters PART II: ================================ 1) The prevalence location of lymphnode metastasis (pelvic and/o high/low para-aortal). 2) The prevalence of lymphnode micrometastasis in high risk endometrial cancer. 3) The feasibility and reliability of the OSNA CK19 test as an intraoperative method to diagnose lymph node macro- and micrometastasis in sentinel nodes will be tested. Histopathological examination (H&E) will be used as control method. In case of discordant cases immunohistochemistry will be used as reference method. The reliability will be defined by the true histological false negative rate.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)