Skip to content

IMPella versus IABP REduces mortality in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI IN SEVERE and deep cardiogenic SHOCK. An international multicenter, randomized trial of the Impella cVAD (left ventricular assist) device versus Intra Aortic Balloon Counter Pulsation (IABP) therapy for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with primary PCI in severe and deep cardiogenic shock

IMPella versus IABP REduces mortality in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI IN SEVERE and deep cardiogenic SHOCK. An international multicenter, randomized trial of the Impella cVAD (left ventricular assist) device versus Intra Aortic Balloon Counter Pulsation (IABP) therapy for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with primary PCI in severe and deep cardiogenic shock - IMPRESS in severe shock

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON39892
Enrollment
43
Registered
2011-11-17
Start date
2012-06-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

severe cardiogenic shock severely depressed heart function

Interventions

After primary PCI, patients will be randomized to supportive treatment with either IABP ('routine care') or the Impella cVAD.

Sponsors

Academisch Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1 Delay between onset of chest pain and PCI * 72 hours 2 Cardiogenic shock defined as: systolic blood pressure * 90 mmHg for > 30 minutes or the need for supportive measures to maintain a systolic blood pressure * 90 mmHg. 3 In order to ensure the most extremist category of cardiogenic shock, only patients who are already mechanically ventilated will be enrolled. For this trial we target a patient population with a Ph

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 Severe aorta-iliac arterial disease impeding placement of either devices 2 Known severe cardiac aortic valvular disease 3 Serious known concomitant disease with a life expectancy of less than one year

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary endpoint is 30 day mortality.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The secondary endpoints to be compared between the patients treated with Impella cVAD and IABP : * Mortality at 6 months, and at 1 to 5 years of follow up * Composite of death and severe acquired disability after 30 days, 6 months, and at 1 to 5 years of follow up.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)